Check it out, this is a quick clip from Fox News where they are discussing the North American Union. There are word daily columnists, a Republican Arizona Senator, and radio talk show hosts ALL discussing the possibility and also the falsifications of a possible NAU. I am not a supporter of Fox News, and really I have no specific ties to any news channel. I just figured it would make my point stronger if I first showed information that was aired by a notoriously conservative station.
Now I realize the clip ended as the Fox reporters pretty much made a joke out of the NAU and even if it was real they claim it would be "nothing more than an effort to coordinate better with our neighbors."
Well where is the effort (congressional bills that Bush will not pass) to secure our borders after 9/11? Right now it would be another fifty years before the fence is built. Yet during WW2, we beat the entire world in just under six years to build the first Nuclear Weapon (Manhattan Project). That was an issue over national security, just as the border is now, yet it was actually treated like a national security issue. The border muck we hear on the news every night just seems like a distraction to bigger agendas. I think that the alternative of broadening our borders is a very bad idea. It would seem an NAU would only favor the corporate hierarchy funding those plans, and even the possibility of this Union shows a complete discount in our national security. Does that make sense?
Now here is a clip from CNN where they interview Independent Task Force on the Future of North America member Robert Pastor. (Basically the guy that is assigned as a spokesperson for the Union).
These two clips perfectly illustrates the extreme bias in the American media channels.
-- Fox News clip ends writing off the idea of an NAU, and if it were real that it would be nothing more than a way to be friendlier with our neighbors. Oh happy day!
-- CNN clip ends as they negate the idea of an NAU while pointing out that the European congressional members just recently voted against higher unified constitutional powers.
What I am trying to accomplish here, aside from the obvious justs at those who thought I was crazy for even mentioning an NAU, is to inform and plant ideas in the minds of the uninformed. I suppose there could be a perfect Union as long as it didn't one day lead to a common currency and constitution (like Europe). Personally however, I would never vote yes for a North American Union (maybe that's why the plans have been relatively hidden from the public). I simply don't trust that this country could remain sovereign after such a unification. It would be a stepping stone for greedier ambitions that eventually would lead to even further destruction of our constitution.
Still skeptical? Check out the government website for the NAU.
Can I get a raise of hands for all those in favor of even possibly demolishing American sovereignty?
Folks, right now is not the time for silence.


1 comment:
It is crazy how no one really knows about this. The only way the entire public would have known is when they briefly discussed it and then it never aired again. So really you would have to watch the news 24/7.
good work T.F.
Post a Comment